Power & Integrity is incubated within
Power

Power lab learning

2Power

We found that the power lens adapts well for organisations, and enables a coherent, holistic and intersectional approach to integrity. Learning about power is uncomfortable but essential.

How to use this resource

Power lab 2

Aims and assumptions

PI’s main thesis is that understanding and addressing power is the key to organisational integrity. In Power Lab 2, we wanted to explore:

  • How power plays out within organisations.
  • If understanding power in an organisational context can help us identify what undermines or enhances integrity.
  • If power analysis provides a lens through which we can see a holistic and intersectional view of organisational integrity.  

    What is ‘power’?

    Power can be positive and liberating, but also negative and oppressive. It exists within and between people and groups, and at a wider societal level. Deeply embedded power structures shape our culture, ways of working, biases and social norms.

    This understanding comes from power analysis, developed within civil society and academia to address inequality, citizen participation and environmental decline.

    Tools and activities

    Tools

    Power Lens

    We adapted the Four dimensions of power framework for an organisational context to:

    • Investigate the root causes of how organisations can cause or perpetuate harm
    • Highlight the experiences and consequences this harm can cause ​
    • Understand how an organisation’s rules and structures can undermine integrity.
    Transformative power framework

    This tool helps us look at different forms of individual and collective power, and how they can be understood, created, and expressed as transformative – as an essential and positive force for change.

    There are four main forms within the framework:

    • power within: self-esteem and self-knowledge
    • power with: collective strength and action
    • power to: the potential to express oneself and act
    • power for: a common vision, values and requirements

    Activities

    As with lab 1, activities in this lab, were participatory, but quite structured and propositional in terms of content, methods and shared language. We worked together to through activities to reveal how power manifests in organisations to undermine integrity, and we imagined how power could transform organisations to embody integrity.

    understanding power

    What we learned

    1The power lens shows how power plays out in organisations

    In the Reveal and Imagine activities, the power lens helped us draw a picture of how power manifests within organisations. Participants were able to examine the effects of power in the different lens dimensions, and how this interacted with other forms of power.

    As well as successfully applying the lens across patriarchy, systemic racism and extractive capitalism, participants agreed the power lens could be:

    • applied to other forms of structural power, such as ablism and classism
    • adapted and expanded to include additional forms as they are recognised.

      2 Organisations unintentionally perpetuate societal inequalities

      The Reveal activity showed how deeply embedded systemic power structures can both influence beliefs and behaviours and feed into policy and practice.  This root cause analysis enabled us to identify how formal policies and decision-making structures can perpetuate inequality by upholding negative norms and standards.

      Before attempting to change working culture and practices, it’s necessary to:

      • fully acknowledge systemic power
      • understand how it manifests internally
      • develop measures for representation within decision making structures.

      Example of patriarchy and gender

      Under patriarchy, women typically bear the brunt of caregiving, so often work part time. Men are usually deterred from part-time working; employers may consider them insufficiently serious about their work, so it risks their career progression. Part time work is therefore devalued.

      Since progression for part-time women is challenging, it’s less likely they become decision makers. And with fewer women in decision-making roles, it’s more likely a gender equity policy is poorly informed about how ensure gender equality in the workplace. So it fails to do so.

      3 Different forms of inequality shape similar mindsets and behaviours of exclusion

      During the Reveal activity, we saw there were commonalities in behaviour, beliefs and policy across a range of systemic root causes.  Without dismissing the distinct characteristics and experience of each form of exclusion, this helped us identify some of the shared root causes.

      For example, beliefs about ability, commitment, or professionalism are often shaped by deeper societal bias against gender, race or economic status (and many other forms). These can all lead to being dismissive of a specific group’s views, reducing opportunities for promotion and decision making on strategy and policy.

        4 Anti-oppression work must be intersectional 

        Discussions of oppression are often too simplistic. There’s a tendency to either attempt to determine which form of oppression is most significant or treat all forms equally.

        The Reveal activity highlighted the need for more nuance. Viewing race, gender and class alongside each other, we could start to see how the systems intersect and experiences of oppression can compound each other

        This intersectional mapping helps demonstrate that all forms of oppression are bound together, coexisting with varying levels of prominence within a single, interweaving system of oppression. Each individual person experiences a unique blend of oppression and privilege.

        Understanding intersectionality is vital to the holistic design and shared accountability that are necessary for transformative change. To illustrate this, we placed the 3Ps Model within a circle of oppression.

        5 Learning about power is uncomfortable but necessary

        Both participants and the PI team expressed moments of discomfort during the lab. But we recognised this as an important part of the learning process. Leaning into it can broaden understanding and perspectives, while also challenging our own thinking.

        Awareness of cognitive dissonance is vital to this process. Being able to actively listen to feedback and perspectives that are at odds with how we perceive ourselves is necessary for transformational change..

        6 Power analysis helps identify foundational steps towards integrity

        The Imagine activity helps organisations understand how they can enable positive transformational power coherently across a range of integrity issues and activities, and more widely across its people, purpose and practices.

        Having formed a vison of the transformed organisation, the power lens helped us look at the steps needed to bring about this transformation. We found many of these steps were foundational to most, if not all the integrity issues. They provided a coherent base on which to add issue-specific knowledge and perspectives needed to address different forms of exclusion in an intersectional way

        Building on insights from the lab, the PI team has developed this list of example foundational steps towards integrity.

        7 The power lens and 3Ps model combined enable a coherent and integrity-centred approach 

        The Reveal and Imagine activities identified, foundational steps towards integrity. Given the need for coherence  across the 3Ps, it became clear that integrity needs to be both strategically centred and owned by all – across the organisation.

        Post lab comments & survey

        Participant views

        • Participants found the power lens helpful and gave an average rating of 3.4 out of 4.
        • Overall, participants agreed that behaviour and beliefs were critical spaces to create change. 
        • After completing the power lens activities, there was a strong sense that we had reached a more tangible phase of our learning journey.
        • Participants commented on an ‘aha!’ moment when power helped them understand integrity better. The 3Ps also felt more palpable.
        • We need to be more explicit connection to systems of oppression and how policy legitimises beliefs

        “The power lens helps to dissect the different aspects of where power lies.”

        Power Lab participant

        Beyond the Lab

        Developing our learning

        The PI team has been working with three organisations to put the tools into practice, develop case examples of the power lens and 3Ps Model applied. Watch this space for examples of practical application and further evolution of the tools. 

        Find out more about the PI initiative

        Check out our media channels

        We’re starting to explain more about PI at events and via blogs and other media channels. See what’s available on our news page.

        Stay updated

        If you want to know how our work is progressing, why not join the PI mailing list? We’ll let you know about news, upcoming events and other important information.

        Get in touch

        Do you want to know more about participating in the PI initiative? Perhaps you have a media enquiry or just a general enquiry about our work? If so, let us know.